The impact of eWOM: a study on the adoption of opinions on consumer online communities

Authors

  • Jorge Brantes Ferreira PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
  • Angilberto Freitas Unigranrio - Universidade do Grande Rio
  • Eduardo Rocha Guarana PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
  • Thais Vieira de Lima Universidade do Grande Rio - Unigranrio
  • Juliana Werneck Rodrigues PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
  • Cristiane Junqueira Giovannini PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18089/

Keywords:

e-commerce, eWOM, consumer behavior

Abstract

Internet has revolutionized word-of-mouth marketing. Once face-to-face, word-of-mouth communications can now be exchanged globally via a multitude of platforms, allowing virtual strangers to share information regardless of geographical boundaries. This study aims to evaluate factors affecting the adoption of information among members of online consumer communities. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was used to analyze data from a 288 respondent sample acquired via survey and results indicate that information utility, majorly driven by its relevance and reliability, is crucial for information adoption processes.

Author Biographies

  • Jorge Brantes Ferreira, PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

    Doutor em Administração pelo COPPEAD do Rio de Docente do programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da PUC-Rio – Rio de Janeiro

  • Angilberto Freitas, Unigranrio - Universidade do Grande Rio
    Doutor em Administração pela PUC-Rio (2009). Pesquisador e Professor adjunto do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade do Grande Rio - Unigranrio. Interesses de Pesquisa:Gestão estratégica de tecnologia nas organizações, marketing e marketing digital, inovação e tecnologias aplicadas à educação.
  • Eduardo Rocha Guarana, PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
    PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro - Graduação em Administração - RJ
  • Thais Vieira de Lima, Universidade do Grande Rio - Unigranrio
    Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade do Grande Rio Unigranrio.
  • Juliana Werneck Rodrigues, PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

    Doutoranda do Programa de PósGraduação
    em Administração da PUCRio

  • Cristiane Junqueira Giovannini, PUC-Rio - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
    Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da PUC-Rio

References

Aaker, D., Kumar, V., & Day, G. (2001). Pesquisa de Marketing. São Paulo: Atlas.

Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. (2ª ed.). New York: Routledge.

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.

Chaiken, S. & Eagly, A.H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 605-14.

Chan, Y., & Ngai, E. (2011). Conceptualising electronic word of mouth activity: An input-process-output perspective. Marketing intelligence & Planning, 9(5), 488-516.

Chen, Z., & Lurie, N.H. (2013). Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth. Journal of Marketing Research. 50(4), 463-476.

Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K. (2008). Rabjohn, N. The Impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229-247.

Cheung, M., Luo, C., Sia, C., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 13(4), 9-38.

Citrin, A. V. (2001). Information quality perceptions: the role of communication media characteristics. Information and Learning, 17, 1-143

Doll, W.J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-74.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3), 319-340.

Dunk, A. S. (2004). Product life cycle cost analysis: the impact of customer profiling, competitive advantage, and quality of IS information. Management Accounting Research. 15(4), 401-414.

Fornell, C.. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

Gelb, B. D., & Sundaram, S. (2002). Adapting to “word of mouse”. Business Horizons Greenwich, 45(4), 21-5,

Goldsmith, R. E. (2006). Electronic Word-of-Mouth. In: Khosrow-Pour, M. Encyclopedia of E-Commerce, E-Government, and Mobile Commerce. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

Goldsmith, R. E. & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 1-16.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.

Hovland, C. I.; Weiss, W. (1951). The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635-650.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Illinois: The Free Press.

Khammash, M., & Griffiths, G. H.( 2011). ‘Arrivederci CIAO.com, Buongiorno Bing.com’ – Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), antecedences and consequences. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 82-87.

Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A.C., & Wilner, S.J. (2010). Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing. 74(2), 71-89.

Lee, M.K., Cheung, C.M., Lim, K.H., & Sia, C.L. (2006). Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web-based discussion boards: an exploratory study. Internet Research, 16(3), 289-303.

Liang, S.W., Ekincia, Y., Occhiocupoa, N., & Whyatt, G. (2013). Antecedents of travellers’' electronic word-of-mouth communication. Journal of Marketing Management. 29(5/6), 584-606.

Madu, C. N., & Madu, A. A. (2002). Dimensions of e-quality. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 19(3), 246-258.

Mcdonough, M. (1997). Frequently asked questions: virtual communities. Artigo preparado para o Thomsom Virtual Communities Laboratory.

Mckinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315.

Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Krishnan, R. (2006). Exploring marketing research. (2ª ed.) South Western College Pub.

Park, C., & Lee, T. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61-67.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Schumann D. (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.

Sullivan, C. (1999). Marketing the web in other media. Editor & Publisher. 132(9), 30.

Sussman, S. W., & Siegel, W. S. (2003). Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47-65.

Varadarajan, P. & Yadav, M. (2002). Marketing strategy and the internet: an organizing framework. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 296-312.

Vieira, V. A., Matos, C. A., & Slongo, L. A. (2009). Avaliação das relações entre qualidade de serviço do site, satisfação, valor percebido, lealdade e boca a boca por meio de um modelo teórico. Revista de Administração, 44(2), 131-146.

Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research. 16(1), 85-102.

Wu, C.; Shaffer, D. (1987). Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(4), 677-688.

Ya, Y., Vadakkepatt, G., & Joshi, A. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity. Journal of Marketing. 79(2), 19-39.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2016

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2016)

Section

Tourism/Hospitality: Research Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Tourism & Management Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The journal retains published articles’ copyrights, but they are simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows individuals’ to share the relevant papers as long as authorship and publication in this journal are duly acknowledged.

How to Cite

Ferreira, J. B., Freitas, A., Guarana, E. R., Lima, T. V. de, Rodrigues, J. W., & Giovannini, C. J. (2016). The impact of eWOM: a study on the adoption of opinions on consumer online communities. Tourism & Management Studies, 12(2), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.18089/

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 > >>